Pride Law family law, mediation & collaborative divorce
Call for an Initial Consultation
412-254-3985

Email Us

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Collaborate. Mediate. Separate. Divorce Doesn’t Have to Mean War.

Billionaire's wife seeking to void prenuptial agreement

Pennsylvania investors in the hedge fund Citadel may know that the fund's wealthy founder filed for divorce earlier this year. His wife is now claiming that the prenuptial agreement that the two had entered into on the eve of their 2003 marriage was a product of duress. These and other allegations were filed in response to the earlier divorce filing.

Under the agreement, she stands to be entitled to an amount that is approximately equal to only 1 percent of her husband's assets. She says that she received her husband's financial disclosures in July 2003, only three days before their planned wedding in Italy. According to the wife's filings with the court, the two got in a fight on that day and broke furniture. The husband then suggested that they see a psychologist. However, he failed to disclose to his soon-to-be wife that he was already the psychologist's patient. The psychologist recommended that the wife give in and sign the prenuptial agreement, which she did.

She now claims that she signed the agreement under duress and was unduly influenced by her husband and his psychologist under the guise of a couple's counseling session with a neutral third party. Additionally, she is asking for sole custody of their two children and for permission to move them to New York. To support her position that she would be the more appropriate parental figure to whom custody should be awarded, the wife says that her husband left the home in 2012 and rarely spends time alone with the couple's children. However, her husband denies all of the wife's claims.

Like any other contract, a court will refuse to uphold a prenuptial agreement if it finds that one of the signatories was fraudulently induced or coerced into signing it. In this case, if the agreement is in fact voided and the parties do not otherwise come to an accord, the court will determine what would be an equitable distribution of the couple's marital property.

Source: CNBC, "Anne Griffin Seeks to Void Prenuptial Agreement With Ken Griffin", Michael J. de la Merced, September 03, 2014

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Pride Law
957 Castle Shannon Boulevard, First Floor
Pittsburgh, PA 15234

Phone 412-254-3985
Fax 888-201-1071
Pittsburgh Law Office Map | Email